<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global Warming:  The &#8220;Cascade Effect&#8221; of Public Opinion</title>
	<link>http://tomneuville.com/archives/243</link>
	<description>Serving District 25 Counties of Rice, Le Sueur, Sibley and Scott</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Adalia</title>
		<link>http://tomneuville.com/archives/243#comment-5138</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomneuville.com/archives/243#comment-5138</guid>
					<description>Public opinion making each other of us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Public opinion making each other of us!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Benjamin Seghers</title>
		<link>http://tomneuville.com/archives/243#comment-3232</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 16:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomneuville.com/archives/243#comment-3232</guid>
					<description>The problem, of course, with this argument is that the global warming is not defended because it appears in media, but it was the science is saying. I would suggest everyone stop focusing on what the media has to say, what Al Gore has to say, what your favorite think tank has to say, what your preferred politico has to say; instead focus on what the science is saying. The message the scientists are saying is loud is clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem, of course, with this argument is that the global warming is not defended because it appears in media, but it was the science is saying. I would suggest everyone stop focusing on what the media has to say, what Al Gore has to say, what your favorite think tank has to say, what your preferred politico has to say; instead focus on what the science is saying. The message the scientists are saying is loud is clear.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Economists &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Global Warming: The &#8220;Cascade Effect&#8221; of Public Opinion</title>
		<link>http://tomneuville.com/archives/243#comment-2994</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomneuville.com/archives/243#comment-2994</guid>
					<description>[...] Global Warming: The &amp;#8220;Cascade Effect&amp;#8221; of Public OpinionBy Tom NeuvilleThe study of &amp;#8220;cascade effect&amp;#8221; was also the subject of a Nobel Prize in 2002 to Daniel Kahneman. &amp;#8220;Availability cascade&amp;#8221; has been coined for the way a proposition can become irresistible simply by the media repeating it; &amp;#8230;Minnesota State Senator Tom Neuville - http://tomneuville.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Global Warming: The &#8220;Cascade Effect&#8221; of Public OpinionBy Tom NeuvilleThe study of &#8220;cascade effect&#8221; was also the subject of a Nobel Prize in 2002 to Daniel Kahneman. &#8220;Availability cascade&#8221; has been coined for the way a proposition can become irresistible simply by the media repeating it; &#8230;Minnesota State Senator Tom Neuville - <a href='http://tomneuville.com' rel='nofollow'>http://tomneuville.com</a> [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
