<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global Warming:  Politics Posing as Science - IPCC</title>
	<link>http://tomneuville.com/archives/244</link>
	<description>Serving District 25 Counties of Rice, Le Sueur, Sibley and Scott</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 22:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Achit</title>
		<link>http://tomneuville.com/archives/244#comment-5135</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomneuville.com/archives/244#comment-5135</guid>
					<description>Politics and global cooling? May be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politics and global cooling? May be.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steve Hartwell</title>
		<link>http://tomneuville.com/archives/244#comment-4689</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomneuville.com/archives/244#comment-4689</guid>
					<description>The one response I enjoy giving to global warming claims is the fact that Mars and other planets are warming up almost the same amount as is the Earth.

I'm not saying that we are not lethally damaging our planet and must stop, for that part is definitely true,

I am saying that Global Warming claims are Junk Science being used by the very people and corporations most responsible for poisoning our planet to hijack the 'save the planet' message to put the blame for it's demise on those Not responsible for it, and manipulate us all to achieve their own dastardly agendae.

Just like the Anti-Smoking Junk Science about Second Hand Tobacco Smoke is doing too.

Steve Hartwell
tobaccosmokersofcanada.ca</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one response I enjoy giving to global warming claims is the fact that Mars and other planets are warming up almost the same amount as is the Earth.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that we are not lethally damaging our planet and must stop, for that part is definitely true,</p>
<p>I am saying that Global Warming claims are Junk Science being used by the very people and corporations most responsible for poisoning our planet to hijack the &#8217;save the planet&#8217; message to put the blame for it&#8217;s demise on those Not responsible for it, and manipulate us all to achieve their own dastardly agendae.</p>
<p>Just like the Anti-Smoking Junk Science about Second Hand Tobacco Smoke is doing too.</p>
<p>Steve Hartwell<br />
tobaccosmokersofcanada.ca
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Benjamin Seghers</title>
		<link>http://tomneuville.com/archives/244#comment-3081</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomneuville.com/archives/244#comment-3081</guid>
					<description>It always baffles me when people, elected politicians no less, would much rather listen to a political think tank than a panel of respected scientists. To me, this is backwards thinking.

Much of what they have to say is simple wrong--not surprising from a unreliable source like the AEI. For example, they write, the summaries &quot;are written mainly by bureaucrats
rather than scientists,&quot; whereas, in reality, they're written by scientists, Nobel Nobel laureates, and other highly respected scientists (e.g. Bernstein, Bosch, Christ, Davidson, etc.). They also say the IPCC process is to update the reports to conform to the summaries, where as they're actual sated policy is to make the summaries &quot;consistent
with the factual material contained in the full scientific, technical and socioeconomic assessment ...&quot;

I could go on, but there's not enough time to cover everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It always baffles me when people, elected politicians no less, would much rather listen to a political think tank than a panel of respected scientists. To me, this is backwards thinking.</p>
<p>Much of what they have to say is simple wrong&#8211;not surprising from a unreliable source like the AEI. For example, they write, the summaries &#8220;are written mainly by bureaucrats<br />
rather than scientists,&#8221; whereas, in reality, they&#8217;re written by scientists, Nobel Nobel laureates, and other highly respected scientists (e.g. Bernstein, Bosch, Christ, Davidson, etc.). They also say the IPCC process is to update the reports to conform to the summaries, where as they&#8217;re actual sated policy is to make the summaries &#8220;consistent<br />
with the factual material contained in the full scientific, technical and socioeconomic assessment &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I could go on, but there&#8217;s not enough time to cover everything.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
